Jump to content

User talk:220 of Borg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

{{ PageViews graph | 90 |User talk:220 of Borg| en.wikipedia.org }}

Joseph Heller, issue resolved

[edit]
Hello, 220 of Borg. You have new messages at I.am.a.qwerty's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Revision needed

[edit]

I read of what you said. I am editing Abdul Qadeer Khan with sources, dont banned me but lets help each other in working this controversial article more precise.

Thanks.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8801:2d80:15d:c919:262d:cf3e:9e7 (talk) 2 July 2020 (UTC)

dump

[edit]

On 12 January there were 22 deaths reported, of them 14 were vaccinated, 8 were not vaccinated. The deaths raised the official state total to 799 deaths. They were 13 men and 9 women, 1 was aged in their 60s, 8 their 70s, 7 their 80s, 5 their 9s and 1 their 100s. 20 were from Sydney and suburbs: 7 south western, 7 Northern Sydney, 3 south eastern , 2 Inner Sydney, 1 the Eastern Suburbs. There was also 1 from the Central Coast, and 1 the Cessnock area.[1]
Daily new cases were 88,164 (only from PCR testing reports). Total PCR tests reported were down ~34% at 88,164 from 134,411.[1] The majority of new cases were from the Sydney region: 6,080 South Western Sydney Local Health District (LHD), 3,655 South Eastern Sydney LHD, 4,929 Western Sydney LHD, 2,841 Northern Sydney LHD, and 2,873 from Sydney LHD. There were another 2,491 from Hunter New England LHD, 1,506 Nepean Blue Mountains LHD, 1,396 Illawarra Shoalhaven LHD, and 1,424 Central Coast LHD, with numbers below 800 cases in all other LHDs.[2]
Cases admitted to hospital rose to 2,383, with 182 in intensive care and 60 on ventilation. The total of reported cases in NSW since the pandemic began there in March 2019 was 566,164.[1] The number hospitalised was a new record high, up on the previous days' 2,242 admissions.

Ontario references

[edit]

Hi 220 Of Borg im really sorry man the cases for Ontario are no longer really a key indicator anymore since PCR testing is no longer widespread anymore User talk:S201050066 7:00 am eastern standard time 30 April 2022

Do not disturb

[edit]

Dont come to my profile and make unnecessary modifications Kpbolumbu (talk) 11:31, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Kpbolumbu: what is this about? What do you mean by "profile"?
Are you talking about a talkpage message I sent you almost ten years ago at 22:50, on 22 July 2015.
Your response to attempts to communicate with you:
"Do not disturb"
suggest that perhaps Wikipedia is not the best on-line venue for you. Collaboration is a basic part of Wikipedia.
Comments such as:
"@Joshua Jonathan: you neither have the guts to speak nor you have enough proof to verify your naxalite thought patterns."
are not in accordance with expected behaviour on this website, especially when directed at an editor with over 100,000 edits.
Regards, 220 of ßorg 13:21, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I find that wikipedia is biased and my valid edits on Talangare were brutally vandalized in spite of following all the wikipedia rules. Joshua Jonathan didn't have the guts to respond on that particular issue. "Unable to digest criticism, my edits have been reverted." Mind you, my edits on the battle of ten kings were on the talk page and not on the main page. "Ain't Murthy a Hindu?" was the question and I was replying to it. Whether someone is Hindu or not is not a Wikipedia as per my belief. If my belief is wrong, then there is something wrong in asking people to follow wikipedia. Kpbolumbu (talk) 17:09, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Where were you when my edits on Ramayana too were vandalized? Kpbolumbu (talk) 14:08, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Just a link added was named as "Assume good faith" (assuming that people are not deliberately trying to hurt Wikipedia, even when their actions are harmful) as in my intention was to hurt wikipedia. My present tone of speech on wikipedia is based on these facts. You assumed bad intentions on me and the only go for me is to revert it. If you have it in you, you specify the actual reason why my edit was "Assume good faith" according to you. Are these words "in accordance with expected behaviour on this website" with rogues? Kpbolumbu (talk) 14:13, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
By "revert" in the previous comment, I didn't meant only to respond and not the wikipedia way of reverting anything Kpbolumbu (talk) 14:20, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The source was faithufully copied here in wikipedia without citing the reference but the link provided to the original source has been vandalized multiple times and you being a silent spectator are advising me now! Kpbolumbu (talk) 14:27, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This makes no sense, poking me also for a warning I posted on their talk nine years ago. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:24, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Age of the Living Dead

[edit]

Hello, 220 of Borg. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Age of the Living Dead".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 19:29, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2025 Queensland floods, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Australian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Susan Bergman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Advocate.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ a b c "COVID-19 (Coronavirus) statistics (for 11 January 2022)". www.health.nsw.gov.au (Press release). NSW Health. 13 January 2022. Retrieved 14 January 2022.
  2. ^ Cite error: The named reference abc-bad-day-21dead-12jan'22 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:220_of_Borg&oldid=1322777552"