Talk:Arch Linux
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Arch Linux article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
"I use arch btw" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect I use arch btw has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 4 § I use arch btw until a consensus is reached. Heyaaaaalol (talk) 21:28, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
CachyOS
[edit]"CachyOS" redirects here, but there is no mention of it anywhere on the page.
The redirect should be deleted. David G (talk) 19:21, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- I just arrived here for the same reason. However, I am not sure if the resolution should be to remove the redirect or mention CachyOS under derivatives. Nuretok (talk) 06:32, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
ddos august 2025
[edit]there 2 edits [1][2] from @Collbrothers and @Ho1Ai
on [1] As of 24 August 2025 the attacks remain
from the given source [3] there is no mention on the date
on [2] As of 30 August 2025 the attack was discontinued
with comment https://archlinux.org/ - site, which was under DDoS (AUR - https://aur.archlinux.org/). Now it works. I'm not sure, when this attack was discontinued, but at least the site didn't work on 2025/08/29 at 6:32 AM UTC+3 and it was OK on 2025/08/30 at approximately 8:15 PM
i think this feel like Wikipedia:No original research case. looking at [4] it may not completely stop yet.
i recommend to wait until there is announcement or another source that report about this
until then i removed both statement for now
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arch_Linux&diff=prev&oldid=1307481253
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arch_Linux&diff=prev&oldid=1308974442
- https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/arch-general@lists.archlinux.org/thread/HEYIMRDNZD2F5UYCH5VAZLBBRJNWFSO5/
- https://status.archlinux.org/
Lokiretro (talk) 23:15, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Linux has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victor Matheus Amaral (talk • contribs) 21:55, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
- B-Class Computing articles
- Mid-importance Computing articles
- B-Class Free and open-source software articles
- Mid-importance Free and open-source software articles
- B-Class Free and open-source software articles of Mid-importance
- All Free and open-source software articles
- All Computing articles
- B-Class Linux articles
- High-importance Linux articles
- WikiProject Linux articles
- Articles edited by connected contributors
