Skip to content

The "." command should be called "source" #310

@jonclayden

Description

@jonclayden

Slightly controversial, perhaps, but with all of fish's commands having nice user-friendly names, "." stands out like a sore thumb. Heck, it's even indexed as "source" in the help page (i.e. after "set_color" and before "status"). I realise issue #211 sort of raised this, but I've never seen a good explanation of why the command is called ".". I therefore suggest changing the name.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    docsAn issue/PR that touches or should touch the docs

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions